Table of Contents
- 1 Why is a literal reading of religious texts problematic?
- 2 What is the arbitrariness problem?
- 3 What is the difference between religion and morals?
- 4 How is morality arbitrary?
- 5 When can it be said your moral beliefs are not really yours?
- 6 What can it be said that your moral beliefs are not really yours?
Why is a literal reading of religious texts problematic?
If the Divine Command Theory is true, then God’s commands are arbitrary. Why is a literal reading of religious texts problematic? Religious belief is required to get us to do our duty.
What is the arbitrariness problem?
An objection levelled against *moral voluntarist positions, especially the *divine command theory. In its most prominent form, the objection states that if acts are right simply because God commands them, then any action would be right if God were to command it.
Which comes first being pious or being loved by the gods?
Socrates and Euthyphro agree that they must be loved by the gods because they are pious. But, says Socrates, in that case, being pious cannot be the same thing as being god-beloved. Because something that is god-beloved is so because it is loved by the gods.
What are some questions asked in normative ethics quizlet?
What are some questions asked in normative ethics? Should the rightness of actions be judged by their consequences? Is happiness the greatest good in life? Is utilitarianism a good moral theory?
What is the difference between religion and morals?
Morality is thought to pertain to the conduct of human affairs and relations between persons, while religion primarily involves the relationship between human beings and a transcendent reality. …
How is morality arbitrary?
Moral arbitrariness is one criterion by which we judge moral decisions. A decision is better, morally speaking, if it is not morally arbitrary and worse if it is. The term ‘moral arbitrariness’ has become prominent in political philosophy since John Rawls’ use in A Theory of Justice.
Why does Socrates believe it is wrong to say that what makes something pious is the fact that the gods love it?
Then the god-loved is not the same as the pious, Euthyphro, nor the pious the same as the god-loved, as you say it is, but one differs from the other. Socrates defends his statement: Because we agree that the pious is being loved for this reason, that it is pious, but it is not pious because it is being loved.
What can we learn from the euthyphro about Socrates religious views?
Euthyphro suggests that prosecuting those who commit injustices is holy, and not prosecuting them is unholy. Euthyphro confirms that he believes all this and more. He says that his knowledge of divine matters is such that he could teach Socrates a great deal that Socrates did not know about the gods.
When can it be said your moral beliefs are not really yours?
when can it be said that your moral beliefs are not really yours? -when you refuse to “do ethics” by using ethics passed down from your culture, family, etc.
What can it be said that your moral beliefs are not really yours?
When can it be said that your moral beliefs are not really yours? The lack the ability to defend beliefs by rational argument against criticism, and a feeling of lostness and bewilderment.