Table of Contents
Who were the nicest conquerors?
So, even nice emperors can leave nasty ones behind.
- Æthelstan (king of England, 925–939)
- Henry VI (king of England, 1422–61; 1470–71)
- Charles I (king of England and Scotland, 1625–49)
- George III (king of Great Britain, 1760–1820)
- Louis XVI (king of France, 1774–92)
- Frederick III (German emperor, 1888)
Who is the most famous conqueror?
- GENGHIS KHAN.
- ALEXANDER THE GREAT.
- TAMERLANE.
- ATILLA THE HUN.
- CHARLEMAGNE.
- PHARAOH THUTMOSE III OF EGYPT.
- ASHOKA THE GREAT.
- CYRUS THE GREAT.
Who was the most cruel ruler in history?
10 most ruthless leaders of all time
- 4/11. Timur.
- 5/11. Queen Mary I (aka Bloody Mary) Reign: 1553-1558.
- 6/11. Vladimir Lenin. Reign: 1917-1924.
- 7/11. Joseph Stalin. Reign: 1922-1953.
- 8/11. Adolf Hitler. Reign: 1933-1945.
- 9/11. Mao Zedong. Reign: 1949-1976.
- 10/11. Idi Amin. Reign: 1971-1979.
- 11/11. Augusto Pinochet. Reign: 1973-1990.
Who was the most powerful and fair king in history?
with no doubt the most powerful and fair king in the history is the Darius the first who ruled the largest empire in history and conquered a lot of it without any bloodshed. However The Alexander the great and Jenghiz khan made a bloodbath of people at the time…
Who was the most powerful king in World History?
every historian know that world most powerfull and mighty Empire was persian and its leader & founder Cyrus The Great was world most powrefull king and ruler… Cyrus the Great (ca.600 – 529 BCE) was a towering figure in the history of mankind undoubted world best and greatest ruler and leader was Cyrus The Great
Who was King Æthelstan?
Æthelstan was the grandson of Alfred the Great and was the first man to be recognised as king of all England. It is difficult to be certain about the personality of figures from so long ago, but accounts of Æthelstan suggest that he was of devout Christian faith and showed compassion and charity to all.
What was King Charles I’s greatest weakness?
Charles’s great weakness was that he made a strict distinction between his role as king, in which he could not compromise, and his personal role, which was entirely pleasant and courteous.