Table of Contents
Which is correct have your cake and eat it too?
This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 30 November 2021. You can’t have your cake and eat it (too) is a popular English idiomatic proverb or figure of speech. The proverb literally means “you cannot simultaneously retain your cake and eat it”. Once the cake is eaten, it is gone.
Do not eat so much cake which sentence?
You cannot eat a cake which you do not possess. If you have no cake, you have no cake to eat. The sentence is nonsense.
What is the saying have your cake and eat it?
It means you can’t eat a cake and continue to possess that cake once you’ve consumed it. The use of the phrase, therefore, is to tell someone that they can’t have two good things that don’t normally go together at the same time, like eating a cake and then continuing to possess that same cake so you can eat later.
Where did the phrase you can’t have your cake and eat it too?
The oldest known use of the proverb you can’t have your cake and eat it too was in a letter from Thomas, Duke of Norfolk to Thomas Cromwell in 1538. In British English, the last word is often omitted from the proverb, as in you can’t have your cake and eat it.
Is cake a countable noun?
“Cake” is a countable noun, but if you want to eat part of the cake, and not the whole thing, you need to quantify it: “a piece of cake.” She baked three cakes.
Which is correct cakes or cake?
The answer is “cake”, but “cake” is defined as both countable and uncountable nouns in a dictionary.
Is cake a plural?
The noun cake can be countable or uncountable. In more general, commonly used, contexts, the plural form will also be cake. However, in more specific contexts, the plural form can also be cakes e.g. in reference to various types of cakes or a collection of cakes.
Is Piece of Cake an idiom?
A piece of cake Meaning: To be easy. Example: No problem, it should be a piece of cake.
What does “you can’t eat your own cake” mean?
This saying uses the meaning “to possess,” and thus literally means “you can’t possess your cake and also eat it.” While some argue over whether this is true or not (see below), think about it: Once you eat a piece of cake, it is gone and no longer in your possession. In other words, you can’t eat a cake and also keep a cake.
Do you eat the cake first or have the cake?
This confusion comes from interpreting the ‘having’ and ‘eating’ of cake as sequential acts rather than concurrent ones. In contemporary English we say, ‘You can’t have your cake and eat it too’. But when we phrase it like this, it makes people think first you have the cake, and then you eat the cake. That’s not asking too much is it?
Is “have your cake and eat it too” grammatically correct?
Of course grammatical pendants will argue Fitzgerald’s use of the word “wrong”. But in any case, the current “have your cake and eat it too” certainly presents an issue of grammatical correctness vs stylistic correctness.
Would Yee both Eat Your Cake and have your cake?
Heywood’s quote reads, “Would yee both eat your cake, and have your cake?” 2 This implies that once you have eaten the cake, you can no longer possess the cake. It’s gone. And there are even earlier attributions in other languages. The Roman playwright Plautus wrote, “ Non tibi illud apparere si sumas potest ” in 194 BC.