Table of Contents
- 1 When did you meet met?
- 2 When did you meet identify the type of sentence?
- 3 Did you meet or have you meet?
- 4 How can we doubt her identify the sentence?
- 5 Did he meet or met?
- 6 What is the difference between had met and met?
- 7 Is “I have met him” a complete thought or a sentence?
- 8 Is I have met him a past or present reference?
When did you meet met?
You have the Present Perfect here. The Present Perfect is formed in the following way: the verb ‘to have’ in the Present Simple—which is either ‘have’ or ‘has’—plus the 3rd form of the verb (Past Participle). So the word ‘met’ in ‘Have we ever met?’ is a Past Participle form and not past tense.
When did you meet identify the type of sentence?
Answer: This type of sentence is called Interrogative sentence.
Did you meet tense?
Since “did … meet” is the past tense of “meet” and “met” is also the past tense of “meet” you shouldn’t use both “did” and “met” in the same sentence. In other words, you shouldn’t say “did met,” because that would be doubling up on the past tense, which is against a basic rule of English grammar.
Have we met before or had we met before?
“had met before” is Past Perfect. “have met before” is Present Perfect. In this context, “I had met him before” seems more appropriate as we are talking about the time which had happenned before the man met me and said things about me.
Did you meet or have you meet?
If “before” in your sentence means “ever, before now”, then “Have we met” would be correct. If “before” refers to a particular occasion before some other specified occasion, then “Did we meet” would be appropriate.
How can we doubt her identify the sentence?
Answer: Interrogative Sentence. Explanation: Bcz in the sentence we have question mark? that why this sentence is interrogation sentence.
What do you think Recognise the type of sentence?
declarative sentence (statement) interrogative sentence (question) imperative sentence (command) exclamative sentence (exclamation)
How did you meet him or met?
‘Met’ is the past tense of ‘meet’. It implies you have met and therefore already got to know this person.
Did he meet or met?
What is the difference between had met and met?
You could use ‘had met him when’ or ‘met him when’ interchangeably in this sentence. The meaning differs only very slightly, as ‘had met him’ emphasizes that it was in the past, while ‘met him’ emphasizes the fact of their meeting. It’s a very slight difference, though.
What is the difference between I have met and I met?
The “have met” form might indicate a more recent meeting, it certainly implies that he is still alive (“I met him” does not suggest that he is or isn’t alive), it might suggest that he is still travelling, and there are many other possibilities.
Is it correct to say I met him or I had him?
Both are correct. When you say “I have met him” (Present Perfect Tense), you have meeting with that person in the near past, and your meeting with the person continues in the present. When you say “I had met him” (Past Perfect Tense), you mean that you met the person when you were somewhere, and it’s a thing of past.
Is “I have met him” a complete thought or a sentence?
Both sentences are correct. “I have met him” is a complete thought. It means that in the past, you met him. By using that tense, you indicate that the statement is relevant to the present.
Is I have met him a past or present reference?
I have met him has both past and present reference – it is grammatically a present tense with semantic (reference to meaning) implication of the past. An activity that happened in the near past has relevance/importance in the present. The effect of a past activity continues into the present.
Can two complete sentences be joined without proper punctuation?
Two complete sentences cannot be joined without proper punctuation. Such a mistake is called a run-on sentence. Even if you join such complete sentences with a comma, it would be considered a comma splice.