Table of Contents
How did Napoleon help democracy?
Many people supported Napoleon, such as my family and the rest of the lower class. This is because he acknowledged their right to own land. He had several reforms of revolution, and one of the most influential was the economic reform. Napoleon contributed to the rise of democracy by allowing people to vote.
Why is Napoleon a good leader in Animal Farm?
In Animal Farm, Napoleon was a great leader because he managed to unite and direct the other animals toward goals. He endured as well. He satisfied some needs of the rest of the animals, some real and others imagined. So in the sense of keeping support, he was great.
How did Napoleon strengthen the government?
In strengthening the machinery of state, Napoleon created the elite order of the Légion d’honneur (The Legion of Honor – a substitute for the old royalist decorations and orders of chivalry, to encourage civilian and military achievements), signed the Concordat, and restored indirect taxes.
Did Napoleon write a commentary on Julius Caesar’s Wars?
Napoleon recalled the accusation with pride. During his final exile on St. Helena from 1815 to 1821, Napoleon indulged his classical interests and wrote a lengthy commentary on Julius Caesar’s wars. Remarkably, it only recently appeared English.
What did Napoleon compare Rome’s Legions to?
Napoleon battled on some of the same fields as Caesar, and calls Rome’s legions as a “standing regular army,” “disciplined” and “intrepid,” worthy of comparison to his own Grande Armée.
What did Paoli say about Napoleon?
Pasquale Paoli, the great Corsican patriot, once told Napoleon: “There is nothing modern in you; you are entirely out of Plutarch.” Napoleon recalled the accusation with pride. During his final exile on St. Helena from 1815 to 1821, Napoleon indulged his classical interests and wrote a lengthy commentary on Julius Caesar’s wars.
What is the significance of Napoleon’s commentary on ancient warfare?
The immense historic significance of the commentary lies in Napoleon’s analysis of the ways and means of Roman warfare. He approaches ancient warfare in a way no true modern writer could: as if he had fought in it.