Table of Contents
Can you sacrifice yourself in the Trolley Problem?
The Trolley Problem, in other words, specifically indexes the moment the humans discover that Michael is back to his old tricks. “See, the Trolley Problem forces you to choose between two versions of letting people die,” Michael says to Eleanor. “And the actual solution is very simple: Sacrifice yourself.”
Is self-sacrifice moral?
The Ethics of Self-Sacrifice It argues that acts of self-sacrifice are morally good only when they do not intentionally frustrate our natural inclinations, and when we gain more than we lose. Otherwise, they are morally defective. The same applies to scenarios where we sacrifice our own lives.
What is the meaning of self-sacrifice in English?
Definition of self-sacrifice : sacrifice of oneself or one’s interest for others or for a cause or ideal.
Should you kill one trolley to save five?
In both versions of the trolley problem above, utilitarians say you should sacrifice one to save five, while deontologists say you should not. Psychological research shows that in the first version of the problem, most people agree with utilitarians, deeming it morally acceptable to flip the switch, killing one to save five.
What happens when a trolley runs down the tracks?
Now consider a slightly different version: A runaway trolley is heading down the tracks toward five workers who will all be killed if the trolley proceeds on its present course. Adam is on a footbridge over the tracks, in between the approaching trolley and the five workers.
Would you push the Fat Man off the footbridge?
The outcome of this scenario is identical to the one with the lever diverting the trolley onto another track: one person dies; five people live. The interesting thing is that, while most people would throw the lever, very few would approve of pushing the fat man off the footbridge.
Would you kill the one and save the five?
In many years of surveys, the vast majority of people — usually about 90\% — have chosen to kill the one and save the five. But until now, there’s never been a study examining how people would react in a lifelike setting with real-looking potential victims.