Table of Contents
How do you deal with inefficient coding turned on by your team?
The best way to do it is by asking questions and showing your colleague the respect you would want if the situation were reversed. By asking questions instead of immediately criticising their bad code, you prompt them to self-evaluate their coding practices.
How can I improve my code review process?
10 tips to guide you toward effective peer code review
- Review fewer than 400 lines of code at a time.
- Take your time.
- Do not review for more than 60 minutes at a time.
- Set goals and capture metrics.
- Authors should annotate source code before the review.
- Use checklists.
- Establish a process for fixing defects found.
Who should review and merge the pull request of a developer?
It takes two to tango, so at least one developer has to be involved except the code author, but of course, more developers can – and sometimes even should – join. Typically when code author opens Pull Request, he/she requests reviewers by selecting who should join the discussion – these developers should get notified.
How do you criticize code?
Team Dynamics
- Soft Skills and Emotional Intelligence.
- Say Something Nice First.
- Be Specific in Your Commentary and Criticism.
- Code Standards Will Vary By Environment.
- Watch for What’s Inappropriate in a Specific Language.
- Check if the Code Can be Easily Maintained.
How should review activities be planned for maximum effectiveness?
Use these seven strategies to review and remember information more effectively:
- Review Your Information Immediately.
- Schedule Further Reviews.
- Test Yourself.
- Rewrite Your Notes.
- Teach Someone Else.
- Put Your Learning Into Action.
- Know When to Take a Break.
How do you manage pull requests?
Best practices in managing pull requests
- Set a Daily Limit on Pull Requests.
- Establish Coding Standards and Guidelines.
- Implement a One-to-One Task Pull Request.
- Review, Review, Review.
- Sync Your Pull Requests With a Project Management Tool.
- Improve Speed of PR Reviews and Merging With CI Automations.
- Avoiding Merge Conflicts.
Should developers merge their own code?
It doesn’t really matter too much who does the merging, as long as you have a consistent process. Merging is fairly routine when it goes smoothly. Clearly it makes more sense usually for the person/people who wrote the code to resolve any conflicts with it. Merge conflicts should be rare.
How to conduct effective peer code reviews?
Performing peer code reviews in an ad-hoc, informal way is also effective because it lets developers adopt the best method for themselves and their teams based on their culture and resources. A team can start by setting this rule: Don’t deploy unreviewed code into production (as you never deploy code without testing it)
What is a peer review in software testing?
A peer review, sometimes known as a code review or walkthrough, is a thorough technical and logical line-by-line review of a code module (program, subroutine, object, method, etc.). During a peer review, code is inspected to identify possible improvements and ensure that business requirements are met.
How many lines of code should a developer review at once?
A SmartBear study of a Cisco Systems programming team revealed that developers should review no more than 200 to 400 lines of code (LOC) at a time. The brain can only effectively process so much information at a time; beyond 400 LOC, the ability to find defects diminishes.
How can I improve my peer review process with Perforce?
Perforce has tools to improve your review process from beginning to end. Perforce Static Analyzers — Helix QAC for C/C++ and Klocwork for C, C++, C#, and Java — can be used to analyze code and eliminate coding errors before the code gets to the peer review phase. Both make sure your code complies with coding rules.