Table of Contents
- 1 Do you agree with the view that end justifies the means?
- 2 What is the meaning of the ends justifies the means?
- 3 Does the end not justify the means?
- 4 Who said ends justify means?
- 5 Why is morality for person only?
- 6 What is a morality person?
- 7 Can a morally right outcome justify the use of immoral means?
- 8 Why are the ends justify the means ethical dilemmas?
Do you agree with the view that end justifies the means?
YES I AGREE with the quote “The end justifies the means.” The means determine the end. If one uses one’s resources properly, the end will be good. If one’s resources are people and they’re misused, they’ll turn back upon the maker or leader. Stalin reversed this, for example, so that his ends justified his means.
What is the meaning of the ends justifies the means?
Definition of the end justifies the means —used to say that a desired result is so good or important that any method, even a morally bad one, may be used to achieve it They believe that the end justifies the means and will do anything to get their candidate elected.
Can you justify morality?
If moral principles cannot be justified by considerations outside themselves yet must be regarded as objectively justifiable, then it seems that certain moral principles must somehow be demanded by the formal character of morality itself; certain rules must be required by any morality that is to satisfy the two demands …
Does the end not justify the means?
But as young kids, we learned that the “end doesn’t justify the means.” In other words, a positive outcome isn’t, well, a good thing if the methods used were dishonest or harmful to others. On the contrary, cheating or avoiding hard classes might keep your GPA high, but using these means never justifies the end result.
Who said ends justify means?
The end justifies the means is a phrase of Sergey Nechayev, the 19th century Russian revolutionary. It means that if a goal is morally important enough, any method of getting it is acceptable.
Who does the phrase the ends justify the means belong to?
Why is morality for person only?
Only Human Beings Can Act Morally. Another reason for giving stronger preference to the interests of human beings is that only human beings can act morally. This is considered to be important because beings that can act morally are required to sacrifice their interests for the sake of others.
What is a morality person?
By definition, moral character is the existence or lack of virtues such as integrity, courage, fortitude, honesty and loyalty. In other words, it means that you’re a good person and a good citizen with a sound moral compass.
Do the ends ever justify the means?
If the goals are good and noble, and the means we use to achieve them are also good and noble, then yes, the ends do justify the means. But that’s not what most people mean when they use the expression.
Can a morally right outcome justify the use of immoral means?
If the answer is “yes,” then a morally right outcome justifies the use of immoral means to achieve it. But there are three different things to consider in such a situation: the morality of the action, the morality of the outcome, and the morality of the person performing the action.
Why are the ends justify the means ethical dilemmas?
The reason that “the ends justify the means” is such an ethical dilemma is that it allows small immoralities to take place in order to achieve larger moralities. Who cares whether you exaggerate some data, if it means your family will have food to eat? Who cares about stealing from the rich if you can give to the poor?
Does outcome bias matter in moral philosophy?
Actually, the psychologi c al phenomenon of outcome bias does not play favorites with topics of modern moral philosophy and makes no statements about areas like virtue ethics or utilitarianism. So, why the misunderstanding? It’s a mistake to think that the core question of moral philosophy is, “Do the outcomes justify the means?”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYST-2-KdP4