What is the difference between eudaimonia and happiness?
Unlike our everyday concept of happiness, eudaimonia is not a state of mind, nor is it simply the experience of joys and pleasures. Moreover, happiness is a subjective concept. Eudaimonia, in contrast, is meant as an objective standard of ‘happiness,’ based on what it means to live a human life well.
What is Eudaimonistic life?
In more general terms, Eudaimonism can be thought of as any theory that puts personal happiness and the complete life of the individual at the center of ethical concern. It can therefore be associated with ethical Individualism and Egoism.
What does enlightened mean in Buddhism?
In Buddhism, enlightenment (called bodhi in Indian Buddhism, or satori in Zen Buddhism) is when a Buddhist finds the truth about life and stops being reborn because they have reached Nirvana.
What is the difference between Nirvana and human flourishing?
The difference is that Nirvana is the realization that human is just a word appearing to mind and not more than that. There is no human that is flourishing. Nirvana doesn’t get rid of humanness, it simply reveals it to be a fallacy, a non existent object. This is the direct experience as this is being written.
What is eudaimonia and where does it come from?
As noted, the concept of Eudaimonia can be traced back to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Prior to this, however, Athenian philosophers such as Socrates and Plato (Aristotle’s mentor) were already entertaining similar concepts.
What is the difference between eudemonia and enlightenment?
The two concepts of Eudemonia and Enlightenment (in Buddhist terms) show that Buddhist concepts are not exclusively “eastern” – but are natural states of mind“. Aristotle’s describes Eudaimonia as the most desired state of mind. The word is variously translated as happiness, flourishing, well-being, living well, fulfillment, perfection, and more.
What is eudaimonic happiness and how do you achieve it?
Rather, eudaimonic happiness is about lives lived and actions taken in pursuit of eudaimonia. Also at this point, you probably understand why some translations are argued to fall a little flat when it comes to describing Aristotle’s philosophical concept.