Table of Contents
Why are archaeological sources more reliable?
Comparative Significance of Archaeological Sources Archaeological Sources are free from the challenges like interpolation & extrapolation because any attempt to change the content of an inscription or coin can be easily identified. Because of this Archaeological Sources are more reliable.
How are literary sources different from archaeological source?
The difference between archaeological and literary sources are: Archaeological sources include buildings, artefacts, coins etc while literary sources include books and biographies. Archaeological sources are the primary sources while literary sources are primary as well as secondary sources.
Do you agree that archeological evidence often helps in the better understanding of literary sources?
Do you agree that archaeological evidence often helps in the better understanding of literary sources? Archaeology cannot conclusively prove or disprove the historicity of events but it can help corroborate events mentioned in the ancient texts to a certain extent. …
What are the archaeological and literary sources of the past?
Classification of the sources: Sources are divided as Archaeological & Literary. Archaeological Sources are divided as Excavation (antiquity), Inscriptions, Numismatics, & Monuments. Literary sources are classified as Indigenous & Foreign. Indigenous literary sources are divided as religious and secular.
How reliable is Archaeology?
In general, the public’ s level of knowledge about archaeology and what archaeologists do is fairly broad and moderately accurate, with the majority of the respondents giving at least one accurate description.
Is Archaeology a reliable source?
Archeological studies help us to date event e.g. the use of carbon-14 dating or radio carbon dating. It has been a reliable source of history since artifacts could be seen and felt. In archaeology, one is bound to use much guess work in the reconstruction of the past, thus leading to inaccurate information.
How do archaeological source materials help learn about the past?
One way archaeology helps us understand the past is through the material objects it finds, allowing us to know what was being used, and when. For example a dig recently found a flute, believed to be the oldest musical instrument found to date.
Do you think that archaeological sources are more reliable for the reconstruction of ancient Indian history?
Therefore, the archaeological sources are more reliable sources to construct the ancient Indian History. These are most important records which are most reliable evidence of what happened during various periods of Ancient Indian History.
How do the literary sources provide information about our past?
Literary sources are the information gathered in written forms that explain the essence of ancient culture. Sources incorporate information like journals, letters, books and investigative reports in impression, automated and visual compositions.
Why are literary sources important?
Answer: literary resources are very important because they help us to know the facts about the rulers and the person who ruled that time and the person who has written that is also treated as a historian because he has or she has given a very brief of that time in in his or her book.
Why is the archaeological source more reliable than the written source?
Why is the archaeological source more reliable than the written sources? It is now generally agreed that the archaeological source is mc important compared to the literary source.
What are the three main sources of archaeological and literary information?
The Archaeological Source can again be divided into three groups, namely, Archaeological Remains and Monuments, Inscriptions and Coins. The Literary Source can also be divided into three groups, namely, Religious Literature, Secular Literature and Accounts of Foreigners.
Can Archaeology be used to study the recent past?
A previous post, Why study everyday life in the recent past?, briefly mentioned the short-comings of ‘traditional’ historical sources. This post follows on from this discussion, to consider how and why – in conjunction with other sources – archaeology might be used to study the recent past.
Can archaeological studies add a new dimension to investigations of the past?
[iii] Instead, it is argued that archaeological studies hold the potential to add a further dimension to investigations of the past. In adopting different approaches to the analysis of a broad range of material sources, new perspectives might be reached.