Is arXiv citable?
You can cite everything that you want, including arXiv contributions. However, you might want to look for alternatives. In case of review/overview articles you often will be able to find some and use them instead without risking plagiarism.
Are papers in arXiv peer reviewed?
Although arXiv is not peer reviewed, a collection of moderators for each area review the submissions; they may recategorize any that are deemed off-topic, or reject submissions that are not scientific papers, or sometimes for undisclosed reasons.
Is arXiv a journal?
arXiv is not a journal; therefore articles on arXiv cannot be regarded as publications per se. Typically, papers deposited on this repository are pre-publication versions and authors can add a DOI to their pre-print version on arXiv after it has been published.
What is arXiv preprint arXiv?
ArXiv is a public preprint server (partly funded by the NSF) which in the past decade has become the dominant method for distributing new papers in the physics community, and more recently in substantial parts of math and CS. It has been called the “physics model” for “open access” publication.
Why publish on arXiv instead of a journal?
Other reasons why authors post their papers on arXiv before or around the same time as submitting to a journal are: To claim scientific priority: Delays at the journal end might lead to your research getting scooped. Publishing on arXiv lets the world know that you were the first one to come up with these results.
When should I use arXiv for citations?
arXiv is also useful for work that is in a format not suited for a conference or journal (e.g. a thesis), or for extended versions of papers that are published somewhere else. I would caution against rules like “I should not cite materials on arXiv because they are not peer reviewed.”
What is the use of arXiv for preprints?
The major use case of arXiv is for disseminating manuscripts that you also publish in a journal or conference. By posting a preprint on arXiv, people can find your research, build on it, cite it, and give you feedback on it immediately, while at the same time the same work goes through the (sometimes slow) peer review process.
What is the difference between conferences and arXiv?
Conferences have a quicker peer review cycle and are more current, but most only publish relatively short papers. arXiv is also useful for work that is in a format not suited for a conference or journal (e.g. a thesis), or for extended versions of papers that are published somewhere else.